Australia prohibits manufacturers from calling their vehicles ATVs when there is no proof the vehicles can handle all types of terrain. Most of the four-wheeled open vehicles that drivers straddle like bicycles are classified as quads.

As in the United States and Canada, ATV sales have risen dramatically in Australia during the last couple of years. A report in Australia’s Farm Weekly says that nearly 15,000 quads were sold just to the country’s agricultural sector in 2008 alone.

In examining records of 107 quad deaths, ACAHS found that men are more likely to die in accidents involving the vehicles. Emily Herde, ACAHS data centre research manager, said that there is “a propensity for quad bikes to roll over and cause serious injury to riders.”

“There are 50 cases within the register that relate to the rollover of a quad bike. Of these, two were front rollovers, eight were side rollovers, nine were rear rollovers and the remaining 31 were unspecified,” Herne said.

According to Farm Weekly, “Solving the problem is proving to be very difficult, with some safety mechanisms like the U and T-shaped rollover protection systems proven to do more harm than good by Dynamic Research Inc in the U.S.”

The ACAHS reminded farmers “not to treat quad bikes as all terrain vehicles, with the industry having to change the name of the bikes from ATV to quad bikes because of proof that they cannot handle all terrains,” the Farm Weekly report said.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › ATV accidents killing Australian farmers at an alarming rate

The boy lost control of the ATV, which the report described as an adult-size machine with a 660-cubic-centimeter engine. He was reportedly thrown from the vehicle and the ATV rolled on top of him, lacerating his legs. Emergency workers rushed the boy to Petrolia Hospital. He was later transferred to London Health Sciences Hospital, where he was underwent surgery for his injuries.

The injured boy was accompanied by another 11-year-old boy who was riding a dirt bike when the accident occurred. Both boys were wearing helmets. The boy on the dirt bike was not injured, according to the report.

The accident came just two weeks after another Ontario boy was killed in an ATV accident just a few miles away in Lambton Shores. In that incident, 7-year-old Kaedon Brown died when the ATV he was riding rolled over onto him.

Although some restrictions governing ATV use by children already exist in Ontario, the OMA says the present laws are inadequate. The association advises that no children under 14 years old should be permitted to drive an ATV of any size within Ontario.

Children 14 to 16, the OMA proposes, should be allowed to drive only low power ATVs incapable of exceeding 30 km/hour. The OMA says the rules should apply to ATV use on both public land and private property throughout Ontario.

Alluding to advertising tactics that portray off-roading as a safe and acceptable form of recreation for children, the association also asks “that the ATV manufacturers respond to medical community concerns and voluntarily discontinue their marketing to children without waiting for legislative restrictions …”

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › Ontario boy severely injured in ATV rollover

All-terrain vehicle accidents

“As physicians, we are seeing far too many children with serious injuries caused by the use of ATVs,” said OMA president Dr. Suzanne Strasberg in a statement. “Ontario’s doctors firmly believe that there is nothing more important than protecting the health and safety of children in the province.”

Statistics show that in Ontario, like in other parts of the world where ATVs are popular, children ages 5 to 19 account for one-third of ATV injuries and fatalities. From 2005 to 2006, 5,584 Ontarians went to the emergency room with ATV related injuries. The number of people hospitalized with injuries sustain in ATV crashes continues to rise sharply year after year.

One reason the OMA says that children make up such a high percent of the injured is their “lack of physical and cognitive ability to operate ATVs.”

“Research demonstrates that ATVs require considerable muscle strength, as well as proficient cognitive, motor and coordination skills, and experience in making split-second judgments; generally these skills are underdeveloped or critically lacking in children,” the OMA report states.

Some restrictions governing ATV use by children already exist in Ontario, but the OMA believes the present laws are inadequate. The association proposes that no children under age 14 should be permitted to drive an ATV of any size within Ontario. Older children 14 to 16 years should be allowed to drive only low power ATVs that cannot exceed 30 km/hour. The OMA wants to see these rules go into effect on both public land and private property throughout Ontario.

The association also asks “that the ATV manufacturers respond to medical community concerns and voluntarily discontinue their marketing to children without waiting for legislative restrictions …”

To help protect against traumatic brain injury and death, the OMA wants government-approved helmets to be compulsory for ATV drivers of all ages.

The Ontario Safety League (OSL) backs the OMA’s proposal. “The risks and dangers that children face when they operate an ATV are overwhelming and can’t be ignored any longer,” said OSL President Brian Patterson. “That’s why the Ontario Safety League fully supports the OMA’s recommendations to strengthen existing ATV legislation and we hope to see swift implementation of these long overdue regulations.”

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › Ontario Medical Association wants children banned from ATVs

Dr. Steven Socransky, medical director of Sudbury Regional’s Trauma Program, urged area residents to exercise every caution when riding on an ATV.

“People must recognize that ATVs are heavy, powerful machines that can be difficult to operate safely, particularly by children and young adolescents. They require strength, training, special skills and knowledge that must be learned over a period of time,” he said in a press release.

According to Sudbury Northern Life, “loss of control” is the most cited cause of ATV accidents. Driver error and negligence sometimes contribute to collisions and rollovers, as do ATV design and defects. The Yamaha Rhino, for instance, has claimed as much notoriety in the ATV world as it did fame for the abnormally high number of injuries and fatalities associated with it. Safety advocates and consumer groups assert that the Rhino’s narrow stance and lack of safety features, among other shortcomings, cause it to roll over unexpectedly on flat terrain and at low speeds. Earlier this year, the CPSC and Yamaha announced a recall of all Rhino models for a series of safety upgrades.

According to Sudbury Northern Life, the Canadian Institute of Health Information reports that “the number of ATV-related injuries severe enough to require hospitalization jumped 50 per cent in Canada between 1996 and 2001, with 36 per cent of hospitalizations occurring among children and youth.”

Moreover, “Stats Canada numbers show ATV and other off-road motor vehicles rank as the fourth most common cause of injury-related deaths among Canadian children and youth aged 5 to 19 years.”

According to Canadian government records, children are six times more likely to receive a significant injury riding an ATV than they are in a conventional motor vehicle.

The ever-growing popularity of ATVs in Canada, combined with the vehicles’ inherent dangers, amount to a serious threat to public safety in Canada. Pleas such as the one made by Sudbury Regional Hospital will likely become more common as growing numbers of people experience first hand the devastation and trauma the vehicles can cause.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › ATV injuries skyrocketing in rural Canada

According to the Herald-Tribune of Grande Prairie, Alberta, the accident occurred just south of the Tumbler Ridge district of northern British Columbia, about 60 miles from the victim’s home.

Witnesses say that Westad was driving up a steep incline when the rollover occurred. A passenger, also female, was thrown from the vehicle while Westad was pinned underneath the overturned ATV for an unspecified length of time. Fellow ATV drivers provided first aid and CPR to Westad until emergency workers arrived.

STARS ambulance personnel were unable to revive Westad, who was pronounced dead at the scene. Investigators say that Westad, who was 40 years old, likely died of blunt force trauma.

ATVs and off-roading are a way of life in Alberta, where rollovers and other accidents are common. From 2002 to 2009, 100 people in the Canadian province died from ATV-related injuries; 89 of that number were male. However, in 2006 alone, there were 623 ATV injuries serious enough to require hospital admission. According to records published by the Alberta Centre for Injury Control & Research, ATV-related hospital admissions grew by 16 percent in a 4-year period from 2003 to 2006.

Just last month, a 6-year-old girl was killed near Stettler, Alberta when the ATV she was a passenger in rolled over. The girl was wearing a full-face helmet and seat belt when the accident occurred.

On July 18, the body of Christopher Zuberbier of Wagner, Alberta was found underneath his ATV in a rural area near Sawridge Creek.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › Alberta woman killed in ATV rollover

Emergency personnel located Zuberbier after receiving a call from an unidentified individual. The workers lifted the ATV off of the man, but he was pronounced dead at the scene. RCMP said that the accident appeared to have happened several hours before it was actually reported. No witnesses have come forward.

Mysteriously, police spotted a band of four or five off-road vehicles driving on Highway 2 less than a mile from the scene of the accident. According to the Edmonton Journal, an officer attempted to approach the group, but it sped off. Police decided not to pursue. Driving ATVs on public roads is illegal in Alberta. Investigators have not been able to determine if Zuberbier was part of the group that police tried to approach.

In rural Alberta, where ATVs and offoading are a way of life, rollovers and other accidents are common. From 2002 to 2009, 100 people died from ATV-related injuries, 89 of which were male. However, in 2006 alone, there were 623 ATV injuries serious enough to require hospital admission. According to records published by the Alberta Centre for Injury Control & Research, ATV-related hospital admissions grew by 16 percent in a 4-year period from 2003 to 2006.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › ATV rollover claims the life of Alberta man

According to Royal Canadian Mounted Police Sgt. Patrick Webb, both girls were wearing full-face helmets and were buckled in with seatbelts at the time of the accident. The girl who was driving was not injured and was able to run home for help, the Edmonton Journal said. RCMP authorities seized the ATV and deceased girl’s helmet. Autopsy tests haven’t been completed.

According to Sgt. Webb, the girls were traveling in a Polaris Ranger RZR, an offroad vehicle that is equipped with a roll cage.

Len Wagner, traffic safety coordinator for the Alberta Centre for Injury Control, told the Edmonton Journal that ATVs are “a way of life” in rural Alberta. Aside from a law prohibiting the driving of an ATV on public roads, the province of Alberta doesn’t have legislation that restricts ATV use on private property. Because children of any age can legally operate an ATV, many people, including parents, may interpret the lack of regulations to mean the vehicles are safe.

“She (the victim) wasn’t big, so did the seatbelt not work on (a person) her size? Did the helmet not work? We’ve got a lot of questions,” Webb told the Edmonton Journal.

Stettler County Council Joe Gendre, whose cousin died from injuries received in an ATV rollover, told the Journal that ATV rules are taken lightly by many people. He said the county designated an officer to patrol the lake district on an ATV because helmet, seatbelt, and registration laws are so often ignored.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › ATV rollover kills six-year-old Alberta girl

The family of Wyatt Bauer of Rimbey, Alberta seeks $400 million CA (about $316 million US). The boy was killed while vacationing with his family in 2007. He received multiple injuries in the rollover, including severe head trauma.

Because the Rhino has a propensity to roll over during normal, safe operation, Yamaha and the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) jointly announced a “voluntary repair program” (effectively a recall), which allows owners of all Rhino models to take their ATVs to their dealership for a series of safety repairs and upgrades. Additionally, Yamaha Motor Co. has told all of its dealers to cease selling new Rhinos until they perform the same safety upgrades to their showroom vehicles.

The safety repairs include the installation of doors, hand grips, and a rear wheel spacer and the removal of the rear anti-sway bar. Several people throughout the US and Canada have been severely maimed or killed while riding in Rhinos because the vehicles have a fundamental design flaw. A narrow track width and a high center of gravity make the vehicles prone to roll over during normal operation. Rhinos also lack some key safety features that would help keep persons contained in the vehicle during a rollover.

The Canadian class action also includes allegations made by a Canadian man whose foot was trapped and crushed under the weight of his Rhino when it rolled over. If his Rhino had been equipped with safety doors, his leg likely could have remained inside the vehicle. Instead, the man’s leg was crushed under the Rhino’s unpadded roll cage, causing injuries that required multiple surgeries.

Acting CPSC chairman Nancy Nord said the Rhino recall was “a critical step toward increasing family safety. “I personally have been so concerned about the number of deaths and injuries associated with these vehicles that I directed staff to step up their investigative efforts,” she said in a statement.

Sources: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aS0pYstKqSYg

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Canadian-Class-Action-prnews-14815334.html?.v=4

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › Death of boy in Rhino rollover prompts Canadian class action suit

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced just last week that owners of Yamaha Rhino 450, 660, and 700 models could take the vehicles to their dealership for free safety repairs and upgrades. Although Yamaha clearly denies on its website that this is not a recall but a “voluntary repair program,” the CPSC believes the vehicles are a substantial risk and advises the public to avoid operating Rhinos until the proper improvements have been made. Yamaha has also told its dealers to refrain from selling Rhinos until the repairs have been made.

Yamaha Rhinos have been under investigation by the CPSC for months. The commission analyzed more than 50 Rhino accidents that involved 46 driver and passenger deaths. Two-thirds of the accidents resulted in a rollover.

Yamaha’s complimentary “repair campaign” addresses some of the issues that make the Rhino so unstable. It will modify the rear wheels with spacers, giving the vehicle a wider track. It will also remove the rear anti-sway bar, which Yamaha expects will reduce the chance of a rollover and improve the vehicle’s stability and handling.

Because hundreds more people have been seriously maimed in Rhino rollovers, Yamaha is also installing half doors and handholds. Those improvements are intended to reduce the number of people who suffer from crushed or amputated arms and legs. Additionally, Yamaha is offering owners free helmets when they update their Rhinos.

Despite the improvements, critics of the vehicle say that they still don’t adequately address the vehicles’ design flaws. Maneuvers that can be performed safely on other ATVs are still unreasonably dangerous when done on a Rhino.

The Canadian lawsuit was filed in Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Dec. 12, 2008 and served to Yamaha last week.

Source: Bloomberg.com

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › Rhino lawsuit moves forward as Yamaha launches repair campaign

Still, another person has unfortunatuely died while riding a Yamaha Rhino.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › man dies in Rhino ATV crash

According to the story, Rhino operators are discovering that side-by-side off-road vehicles such as theirs are technically classified as ORVs, which may be subject to different legislation than ATVs, including requiring operators to register the vehicle, wear a helmet and carry proof of insurance.

Provincial legislation draws a clear distinction between ATVs and ORVs, classifying an all-terrain vehicle as having saddle-seating designed for one person, and handlebars, while Rhinos are technically off-road vehicles – they have a steering wheel, bench seats, and are designed for up to four people.

A quick search for ORV and ATV regulations reveals that most U.S. states have various laws governing the operation of these types of vehicles, and also different ways of classifying them. Some states draw a clear distinction between ATVs and ORVs, while others are not as specific. Many times, the terms are used interchangeably.

In many states, an ATV or ORV must be titled – this is proof of ownership. Additionally, some states require that an off-road vehicle is registered for riding on public land and roads, and ATVs are only permitted on public land and roads that are clearly designated for use by off-highway vehicles (OHVs or ORVs).

According to information provided by the Alabama Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division, in Alabama, any vehicle used on public roads must be registered, titled, and tagged by the Department of Revenue’s Motor Vehicle Division (MVD). However, there is an exemption for both ATVs and ORVs. If you have a vehicle used only on your own property or off-road, you do not have to register, title, or tag it.

Each state is different, so ATV and ORV owners should check with their state for distinctions and regulations.

SOURCE: Yamaha Rhino Rollover › ATV or ORV?